Llwytho...
The measurement of lung water
INTRODUCTION: In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available methods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients. REVIEW: Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common strategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within 10% of the gravim...
Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
| Prif Awduron: | , |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | Erthygl |
| Iaith: | en |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
BioMed Central
1999
|
| Pynciau: | |
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137228/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094478 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc342 |
| Tagiau: |
Ychwanegu Tag
Dim Tagiau, Byddwch y cyntaf i dagio'r cofnod hwn!
|
| id |
pubmed-137228 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
pubmed-1372282003-02-27 The measurement of lung water Lange, Neale R Schuster, Daniel P Crit Care Review INTRODUCTION: In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available methods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients. REVIEW: Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common strategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within 10% of the gravimetric gold standard) and most reproducible (< 5% between-test variation) are also, unfortunately, the most expensive and most difficult to implement for purposes of large-scale clinical trials or for routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The standard chest radiograph remains the best screening test for the detection of pulmonary edema. Indicator-dilution techniques are probably the best available method at present for quantitation in patient groups. BioMed Central 1999 1999-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC137228/ /pubmed/11094478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc342 Text en Copyright © 1999 Current Science Ltd |
| institution |
US National Library of Medicine |
| collection |
PubMed Central |
| language |
en |
| format |
Article |
| topic |
Review |
| spellingShingle |
Review Lange, Neale R Schuster, Daniel P The measurement of lung water |
| description |
INTRODUCTION: In this review, we compare the spectrum of currently available methods for quantifying pulmonary edema in patients. REVIEW: Imaging and indicator dilution techniques comprise the most common strategies for measuring lung water at the bedside. The most accurate (within 10% of the gravimetric gold standard) and most reproducible (< 5% between-test variation) are also, unfortunately, the most expensive and most difficult to implement for purposes of large-scale clinical trials or for routine clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The standard chest radiograph remains the best screening test for the detection of pulmonary edema. Indicator-dilution techniques are probably the best available method at present for quantitation in patient groups. |
| author |
Lange, Neale R Schuster, Daniel P |
| author_facet |
Lange, Neale R Schuster, Daniel P |
| author_sort |
Lange, Neale R |
| title |
The measurement of lung water |
| title_short |
The measurement of lung water |
| title_full |
The measurement of lung water |
| title_fullStr |
The measurement of lung water |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The measurement of lung water |
| title_sort |
measurement of lung water |
| publisher |
BioMed Central |
| publisher_facet |
BioMed Central |
| publishDate |
1999 |
| url |
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC137228/ https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11094478 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc342 |
| _version_ |
1759034746060406784 |