Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing

This is the third part of a comprehensive, quantitative study of biomedical book reviewing. The data base of the total project was built from statistics of 3,347 reviews of 2,067 biomedical books appearing in all 1970 issues of fifty-four reviewing journals. This part of the study explores the dupli...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chen, Ching-chih
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:en
Publicado em: 1974
Assuntos:
Articles
Acesso em linha:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC198797/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4471577
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id pubmed-198797
record_format dspace
spelling pubmed-1987972003-11-05 Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing Chen, Ching-chih Bull Med Libr Assoc Articles This is the third part of a comprehensive, quantitative study of biomedical book reviewing. The data base of the total project was built from statistics of 3,347 reviews of 2,067 biomedical books appearing in all 1970 issues of fifty-four reviewing journals. This part of the study explores the duplication patterns in book reviewing among these media. It is found that 35.17% (727 books) of the 2,067 titles were reviewed more than once in 1970, these titles accounting for 2,007 of the total of 3,347 reviews. For the most part, reviews of the most frequently reviewed titles appeared in such journals as British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine. These five journals covered 93.53% of the 727 books reviewed more than once in 1970. 1974-07 /pmc/articles/PMC198797/ /pubmed/4471577 Text en
institution US National Library of Medicine
collection PubMed Central
language en
format Article
topic Articles
spellingShingle Articles
Chen, Ching-chih
Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
description This is the third part of a comprehensive, quantitative study of biomedical book reviewing. The data base of the total project was built from statistics of 3,347 reviews of 2,067 biomedical books appearing in all 1970 issues of fifty-four reviewing journals. This part of the study explores the duplication patterns in book reviewing among these media. It is found that 35.17% (727 books) of the 2,067 titles were reviewed more than once in 1970, these titles accounting for 2,007 of the total of 3,347 reviews. For the most part, reviews of the most frequently reviewed titles appeared in such journals as British Medical Journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine. These five journals covered 93.53% of the 727 books reviewed more than once in 1970.
author Chen, Ching-chih
author_facet Chen, Ching-chih
author_sort Chen, Ching-chih
title Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
title_short Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
title_full Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
title_fullStr Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
title_full_unstemmed Current Status of Biomedical Book Reviewing: Part III. Duplication Patterns in Biomedical Book Reviewing
title_sort current status of biomedical book reviewing: part iii. duplication patterns in biomedical book reviewing
publishDate 1974
url https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC198797/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4471577
_version_ 1759042440316059648

Registos relacionados