A carregar...

Breast Cancer Subtypes and Response to Docetaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Use of an Immunohistochemical Definition in the BCIRG 001 Trial

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen. METHODS: Pathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91%) from the BCIRG 0...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors: Hugh, Judith, Hanson, John, Cheang, Maggie Chon U., Nielsen, Torsten O., Perou, Charles M., Dumontet, Charles, Reed, John, Krajewska, Maryla, Treilleux, Isabelle, Rupin, Matthieu, Magherini, Emmanuelle, Mackey, John, Martin, Miguel, Vogel, Charles
Formato: Artigo
Idioma:English
Publicado em: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2667821/
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204205
https://ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1024
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Descrição
Resumo:PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic and predictive significance of subtyping node-positive early breast cancer by immunohistochemistry in a clinical trial of a docetaxel-containing regimen. METHODS: Pathologic data from a central laboratory were available for 1,350 patients (91%) from the BCIRG 001 trial of docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) versus fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) for operable node-positive breast cancer. Patients were classified by tumor characteristics as (1) triple negative (estrogen receptor [ER]–negative, progesterone receptor [PR]–negative, HER2/neu [HER2]–negative), (2) HER2 (HER2-positive, ER-negative, PR-negative), (3) luminal B (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and either HER2-positive and/or Ki67(high)), and (4) luminal A (ER-positive and/or PR-positive and not HER2-positive or Ki67(high)), and assessed for prognostic significance and response to adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients were subdivided into triple negative (14.5%), HER2 (8.5%), luminal B (61.1%), and luminal A (15.9%). Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates (P values with luminal B as referent) were 67% (P < .0001), 68% (P = .0008), 82% (referent luminal B), and 91% (P = .0027), respectively, with hazard ratios of 2.22, 2.12, and 0.46. Improved 3-year DFS with TAC was found in the luminal B group (P = .025) and a combined ER-positive/HER2-negative group treated with tamoxifen (P = .041), with a marginal trend in the triple negatives (P = .051) and HER2 (P = .068) subtypes. No DFS advantage was seen in the luminal A population. CONCLUSION: A simple immunopanel can divide breast cancers into biologic subtypes with strong prognostic effects. TAC significantly complements endocrine therapy in patients with luminal B subtype and, in the absence of targeted therapy, is effective in the triple-negative population.